From owner-freebsd-security Fri Mar 12 9:18:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ints.ru (ints.ru [194.67.173.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6CA153D4 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 09:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ilmar@ws-ilmar.ints.ru) Received: from ws-ilmar.ints.ru (ws-ilmar.ints.ru [194.67.173.16]) by ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA23371; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:17:02 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws-ilmar.ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA91673; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:17:50 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:17:50 +0300 (MSK) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" To: Matthew Dillon Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture In-Reply-To: <199903120628.WAA73182@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> Here's an idea.. FreeBSD could pay for a 3rd party security audit > :> of a stock FreeBSD system. Peter Shipley did this for Whistle > :> and the InterJet (a "black box" approach). No problems were found > :> but it was good to know that :-) > :This is a joke, right? > It would be hillarious if we could get a C2 certification for a base > GENERIC system. With posix.1e fully implemented it should get B2 ;-) but who will pay for sertification??? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message