From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 15 14:09:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA01757 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:09:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from eyelab.psy.msu.edu (eyelab.psy.msu.edu [35.8.64.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA01748 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:09:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@eyelab.psy.msu.edu) Received: from eyelab3.psy.msu.edu (eyelab3.psy.msu.edu [35.8.64.180]) by eyelab.psy.msu.edu (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA17675 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 18:02:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199710152202.SAA17675@eyelab.psy.msu.edu> X-Sender: root@eyelab.msu.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro 4.0 Beta 1 (build 175) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 17:05:57 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Gary Schrock Subject: Re: Anti-spam sendmail in 2.2.5? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id OAA01749 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 02:42 PM 10/15/97 -0400, you wrote: >think sendmail shouldn't relay ANY traffic not coming from the box it >resides on by default. Hmm, wouldn't that make things painful for those of us using pop mail clients that use smtp to bounce our mail off the server to send?  I don't think this is really *that* unusual of an arrangement. Gary Schrock root@eyelab.msu.edu