Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:52:04 +0100 From: Mark R V Murray <mark@grondar.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Arthur Mesh <arthurmesh@gmail.com>, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org>, secteam@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: random(4) plugin infrastructure for mulitple RNG in a modular fashion Message-ID: <0C97B866-A169-4141-8368-AA7F5B5382F4@grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <86a9kf733d.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <20130807183112.GA79319@dragon.NUXI.org> <86pptfnu33.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130815231713.GD76666@x96.org> <20130816002625.GE76666@x96.org> <9B274F48-0C88-4117-BEAC-1A555772A3C5@grondar.org> <86a9kf733d.fsf@nine.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 18 Aug 2013, at 10:36, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > Mark R V Murray <mark@grondar.org> writes: >> When I commit Fortuna, I'll also be adding (back) options YARROW_RNG >> and FORTUNA_RNG, > > Why would you do that? What's wrong with "device fortuna"? As I said in a previous mail, "nothing". :-) I'm looking at the new "adaptors" code and wondering what its for. If the current three /dev/random drivers were each in KLDs, then kldloading the one you wanted would be sufficient without the extra complexity. Yes, this does represent a change of mind on my part; I was initially enthusiastic about this. M -- Mark R V Murray [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQCVAwUBUhCZRN58vKOKE6LNAQqdOgP+OtwvmDfOpEq5NCqTXn1PulxLMd78V2R+ /xP3KcW2blaZd83dyDBUc+XyQq4sZ10r5J68J749Ia1xUVHz+Rh8gC4G02Q3loRe e4C9YbN2LSoN1nxgxiazqXmloWG5NB3Ph7x4kQyA6XPE7PNu8KCf+X2T+Zl7dhMb Cxk+2iwqq6E= =ALMJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0C97B866-A169-4141-8368-AA7F5B5382F4>