From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 14:23:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF19106566C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepi201.cox.net (eastrmfepi201.cox.net [68.230.241.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AFC8FC1B for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo306.cox.net ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120119140053.HNRX24648.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo306.cox.net>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:00:53 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo306.cox.net with bizsmtp id PS0t1i0061BeFqy02S0tNP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:00:53 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.4F182215.0191,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=QFd1i8EmGWXMF/FLlwwalaY9IE87M3wXCJnHJtyYFmw= c=1 sm=1 a=8wRMBscN-XIA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=DY3Z457fF1V8nxFfaGoA:9 a=2BgPgKv0DlEe5ChsGOgA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0JE0qeI006659; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:00:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:00:47 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: arved@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120119080047.33723bc6@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <201201191343.q0JDhShU029298@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201201191343.q0JDhShU029298@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/164304: [patch] update libcdio-dependent ports for libcdio 0.83 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:23:58 -0000 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:43:28 GMT arved@freebsd.org wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] update libcdio-dependent ports for libcdio 0.83 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: arved > State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 19 13:43:13 UTC 2012 > State-Changed-Why: > Committed. Thanks for catching the one port i missed :) > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164304 I take it the patch applied cleanly? I was a little worried, because not long after I submitted that, I noticed one of the affected ports had an update (sorry, I got distracted with some other things, and I'll be damned if I can remember now which one!). :-) But, if there were no problems with the patch, then cool. Thanks! -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net