From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 7 12:02:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA01616 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA01602 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id MAA24005; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma023999; Mon Jul 7 12:01:07 1997 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) id MAA15711; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:01:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199707071901.MAA15711@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: VJ compression and MAX_HDR In-Reply-To: <199707070204.TAA19627@implode.root.com> from David Greenman at "Jul 6, 97 07:04:18 pm" To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >(Max IP header = 64 bytes) + (max TCP header = 64 bytes) = 128 bytes > MLEN, > >no? > > Perhaps, but I don't think any of the current TCP options are large enough > for this to be a problem (I think the largest is still under 40 bytes). This makes it no less of a bug, just a bug that's not likely to hurt you :-) Should I file a PR, so that it will be explicitly documented? -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com