From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 06:05:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E9316A4CE; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:05:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9E343D58; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:05:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from zaphod.softweyr.com (cpe-66-75-60-23.san.res.rr.com [66.75.60.23]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2797E1407806; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:05:37 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.COM To: obrien@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:05:37 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502282142.j1SLgvhh067909@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050301041945.GA85655@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050301041945.GA85655@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502282205.37595@zaphod.softweyr.com> cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Wes Peters cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 machdep.c src/sys/kern kern_mib.c src/sys/sys sysctl.h systm.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 06:05:39 -0000 On Monday 28 February 2005 20:19, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:42:57PM +0000, Wes Peters wrote: > > wes 2005-02-28 21:42:57 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > > sys/i386/i386 machdep.c > > sys/kern kern_mib.c > > sys/sys sysctl.h systm.h > > Log: > > Add a sysctl that records the amount of physical memory in the machine. > > > > Submitted by: Nicko Dehaine > > MFC after: 1 day > > Uh, I hope you will fix the build on all non-i386 platforms before you > MFC. Where were they suppose to get the 'realmem' definition from? ARGH! Will do. Sorry 'bout that. My sparc is still trying to get itself updated to -current, so this didn't get tested quite enough. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com