From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 21:51:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9BB950 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593E1198D for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fh20so13820090lab.34 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:51:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WbXNwTTtwVJ57iUGflQZ1DHt2MgonRIKbSM7Ur5zEhs=; b=eiCsoBme/69H6fRzxOxQ7fEfz7VeZKktu9f7VtTv1yFRGKuakbLMrjjJibBQHu6E7y TIytppZKSrMbUL4AtpW1pcW5SUmG7VMOc7YQ53gSLEKcwQ/TN3ZfSBaq/nDpO8KWjzNg 9tkDeMqU0DqD8tCA3ZotFUQ2LbPDC7EV1vb7Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=WbXNwTTtwVJ57iUGflQZ1DHt2MgonRIKbSM7Ur5zEhs=; b=m+oENuB+tm7nHDmT+e/uKHkQ/II6+yqCYCEafy5ZQE/wI66N7NYX+5xEtdmXjelir4 T16NOqErv9uvKUvvfHafn3t4q27F1BofGXJrZqMIc4PhaztZnFAJ/rioPUPgGkXgPxmh 8842Lm+Hu8B4xS5pHWZiMRZhReUybLTaebPKuw0lUbQPM581LSSHnmXLHvVUyaM8r6N3 XSL2d4M2JTMfa2Ke2eDuqg7R9QKtIUPg8yN38+kYlaToZ0wMPNXrzTe6QmZ0nMvuVNMK kSe2UEfSYsj9/OfQkxjHbZKfQfjxx9FHrFfOVDF3aHAiy6tqbR1QTzb//EINYUmuH24s 6ueg== Received: by 10.152.106.163 with SMTP id gv3mr55858604lab.55.1357509075896; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:51:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.75.200 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:50:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201301062004.50665.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <201301060952.08631.hselasky@c2i.net> <201301062004.50665.hselasky@c2i.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 16:50:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD To: FreeBSD Hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEyVoQVLlk/BG+wABr7TwcjSzTVY4o6F7gKxtQw9GYD7A58Q7Rf41I+ZqomRAKBKO5SuPu X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:51:17 -0000 context: I have a USB nic which worked in 9.1 but regressed in HEAD and appears as an unrecognized device. - 9.1-RELEASE is known to be working (this is r243808 I think) - r245084 is broken - r244446 is broken - r244127 is broken - r243968 is broken I should have time to do more bisection next week. If someone has an idea of a specific commit which may have broken it please let me know. Use(full|less) debug info: I now see xhci_do_command: Command timeout! device init 2 failed USB_ERR_TIMEOUT Any suggestions or pointers are appreciated: ugen2.3: ... idVendor = 0x0bda idProduct = 0x8150 bcdDevice = 0x0100 iManufacturer = 0x0001 iProduct = 0x0002 iSerialNumber = 0x0003 <8628> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hans Petter Selasky Date: 6 January 2013 14:04 Subject: Re: regression: if_rue device doesn't attach on HEAD To: Eitan Adler Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org On Sunday 06 January 2013 19:00:03 Eitan Adler wrote: > On 6 January 2013 03:52, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Could you do a diff between 9.1 and 9-stable sources and see what is > > changed? Might be some BIOS/ACPI stuff too. > > I havn't had a chance to go much beyond this but > > - 9.1-RELEASE is known to be working (this is r243808, right?) > - r245084 is broken > - r244446 is broken > - r244127 is broken > - r243968 is broken Hi, >From what I can see from the SVN log, there has been no relevant changes in the USB core since r242xxx: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/sys/dev/usb/ I suspect the problem is somewhere else, like PCI/BIOS/ACPI. --HPS -- Eitan Adler