From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 05:40:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5C916A4B3 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBCE43FBD for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h91CeLFY066705 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h91CeL8p066704; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200310011240.h91CeL8p066704@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re: ports/57450: [update orphaned port] mail/ssmtp: update to2.60.4 and take maintainership X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oliver Eikemeier List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:40:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/57450; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Oliver Eikemeier To: Clement Laforet Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/57450: [update orphaned port] mail/ssmtp: update to 2.60.4 and take maintainership Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:31:28 +0200 Clement Laforet wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:14:16 +0200 > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>Clement Laforet wrote: >> >>Ok, I see that update to 2.60.4, but where do you use USE_OPENSSL? > > USE_OPENSSL is already defined. > > If my memory serves me right, in order to use correctly USE_OPENSSL hook you need: > * use bsd.port.pre.mk/bsd.port.post.mk > or > * include > > I prefer the first one. :) .include is just fine. You may have to fiddle around a bit to get the program actually to link with OpenSSL from a port. Does it work? >>>+.include >>>+ >>>[...] >>>-.include >>>+.include >>>+ >> >>Why do you do this? > > now you know ;o) Ok, you don't need to do that. You'll get .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk" for free from bsd.port.mk...