Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:29:34 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Adrian Penisoara" <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today Message-ID: <864pcuxbc1.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com> (Adrian Penisoara's message of "Thu\, 31 Jan 2008 08\:45\:55 %2B0200") References: <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Adrian Penisoara" <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> writes: > Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use > as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would > you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project tracking > FreeBSD as base that would allow better teams cooperation and easy code > merging between projects/branches ? Subversion, hands down. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864pcuxbc1.fsf>