From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 27 15:24:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D870316A414 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B267440F5 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k5REtMv4061495; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:55:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k5REtHG6061494; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:55:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:55:17 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20060627145517.GA61466@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <1151350344.40202.10.camel@triton.mcneil.com> <44A0380A.1000902@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20060626195820.GA78155@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44A0FF9D.4010802@uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A0FF9D.4010802@uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: openoffice support and other ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:10 -0000 On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:51:25AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:39:54PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>Are they really AMD64 ports or do they still need some ia32-compat-tweaks? > >> > > > >Yes. > > > > All right, for those, like me, who are not as fast as others in sucking > in informations: > This means I do not need the 32-Bit compatibility-crap anymore? Probably, yes. However, I keep the 32-bit linux emulation for the occasion odd application, for example, acroread. Although xpdf is fast and rendered good looking docs, there are some convenient features in acroread. -- Steve