Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:32:20 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> To: Alexandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, geom@freebsd.org, embedded@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA Message-ID: <4B8D67C4.9050709@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <20100302104748.0f27136c.ray@dlink.ua> References: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua> <20100302071736.GF1946@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100302104748.0f27136c.ray@dlink.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010-03-02 09:47, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: >>> Definiatelly separately, not sure where. There is ongoing discussion >>> somwhere on importing this algorithm to the base for tar(1) to use, it >>> would be best to have only one copy of code in the tree. > I have already said, that it would be good for embedded platforms have only one copy of the code for the kernel and userland. > It is not thought of how done it. I think Pawel means the *source* code in this case, not the executable code. E.g. lzma source should most likely go under /usr/src/contrib, and be built separately for kernel and userland.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B8D67C4.9050709>