Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:36:38 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_execve.c Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10211142034280.25390-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200211150116.gAF1GEhq032365@arch20m.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Modified files: > > > lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_execve.c > > > Log: > > > When about to do an execve(), don't reset the O_NONBLOCK flag on any file > > > descriptors that have the close-on-exec flag set, as that will have no > > > effect anyway and might screw something else up if the file descriptor > > > happens to be shared with another process. > > > > I didn't like this change. It was a hack to cover up some other > > problem. > > But it was harmless, right? I figured it fixes some corner case without > causing any additional bugs so why not? Yes, but might help to hide what the real problem is (if there is one). > The real underlying problem doesn't seem solvable; I'd rather wait > until libc_r is KSE'ified. I don't envision that. That's what libpthread is for. Death to libc_r, death to them all... :-) -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10211142034280.25390-100000>