From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 16:50:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5141616A4CE for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:50:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40E643D2D for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:50:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7355C1FFDD6; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:50:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 6B87D1FFDD4; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 5192815672; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BC215329; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:48:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: John-Mark Gurney In-Reply-To: <20040818163840.GE99980@funkthat.com> Message-ID: References: <20040817072438.GA99980@funkthat.com> <41223F40.8030702@mcsi.pp.ru> <20040818163840.GE99980@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: Maxim Maximov cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new if_sk locking patch... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:50:11 -0000 On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > I took a quick look, and did some tests last night, and I couldn't > get the box to hang. I will admit I don't have the fastest hardware, only the interface "hangs" and not the whole box. only seens problem reports for the Yukons for that. > I was running with debug.mpsafenet=1 on a Uniproc box though. I'm going > to commit my locking patch shortly, and could you test again? might be able to test later this evening but cannot promise. are you going to remove the XXX before ? I really do not like the patch as is (w/ or w/o the XXX) but it's better than nothing for now I guess. BTW: hadn't had LORs with dwhite's patch when using modularized version on my amd64 box. Seen LORs when compiled into the kernel. Well at least that's what I think it had been. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT