From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 6 02:05:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F354816A417 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:05:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF713C44B for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:05:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so820584waf for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zCG8vYgxcLULPCtOcu7HxorKLLYfjAAVY6mCk+RQmFc=; b=Sv/JPhE3S8JO4mf0rQ7ZDiD1MNpd+1QZ1vQbsvzpSJTuZhkZidBmKnnWsuOIYZGd4fNIfaZWvy4v+es/gK27qD2vtnCngvDwm7CrDsEe+W/VYKmK+ZJ7npYiwTJWSgchTGqn5Loyk2IwR3C3tT1+J64rQ47d2c0Ts1kgeciTCBU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=rA1NzZLMo/eVXLwki9/SOPZAc8fjMyYPI1srIttE7jHrb5T6oWejn8yS2/MQjEXmbjtHBib+mBu1fl9P87dBSAWo0xAlHnA9+HEC0DgfNL6U9fkldSzlNa1Iw01geZOYE7K5atpOiFT6mQE/LJ+m1juezTSi9hK3aUt2X93srhI= Received: by 10.115.109.1 with SMTP id l1mr162768wam.1191636350438; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m40sm7283683wag.2007.10.05.19.05.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l96228qs039919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:02:08 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l96227fl039918; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:02:07 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:02:07 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Chris Message-ID: <20071006020207.GA39579@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20071004013622.GD30781@cdnetworks.co.kr> <3aaaa3a0710051900m5ececabcpfd28c7e5e391f7e7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0710051900m5ececabcpfd28c7e5e391f7e7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: msk(4)/nfe(4) with 88E1116 PHY X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:05:51 -0000 On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:00:13AM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 04/10/2007, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There had been several complaints that nfe(4) with 88E1116 PHY > > doesn't work. The attached patch may fix it by taking the PHY > > out of powerdown mode. Because I know that some revisions works > > well without any patch I'd like to know whether attached patch > > have any effects for those hardwares that had been working > > correctly. I think both msk(4) and nfe(4) would be affacted by > > the patch so if you're using one of these hardwares please give > > it spin and let me know the result. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > Regards, > > Pyun YongHyeon > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > Pyun I am using Marvell 88E1116 Gigabit PHY but have had no stability > problems with the unpatched driver in 6-STABLE. > Would you apply the patch to stable and let me know the result? There should be no regression for your case. > Chris -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon