From owner-svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 01:46:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53C210656C4; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999A58FC19; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (S0106001372fd1e07.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.171.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0K1k7BX040756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:46:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <49752CD3.6020506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:45:55 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <200901191536.n0JFaPTN014129@svn.freebsd.org> <20090119.181124.-1270972755.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090119.181124.-1270972755.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-7@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187434 - stable/7/sys/amd64/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:46:11 -0000 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > Robert Watson writes: > : > : On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > : > : > Author: sobomax > : > Date: Mon Jan 19 15:36:25 2009 > : > New Revision: 187434 > : > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187434 > : > > : > Log: > : > MFC: take NTFS option out to match i386 GENERIC. > : > : Are you going to modify UPDATING to say that "options NTFS" will now be > : required where it wasn't previously on amd64? Also, insta-MFC's are generally > : a bad idea, even for changes believed harmless, as they often have unexpected > : side effects. > > Especially since NTFS works very well in 6.x and I think in 7.x. It > is only in -current that there are issues exposed by other work... Warner, The point is not whether it works or not. The point is that i386 and amd64 kernels should provide the same feature set. See the thread on current@ -Maxim