Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:03:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193185] [stage] net/ipsorc MASTER_SITES LICENSE WWW take maintainership Message-ID: <bug-193185-13-t2oN3KTXcZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193185-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193185-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193185 C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #146766|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- Created attachment 146767 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146767&action=edit net/ipsorc OBSOLETES previous. JM is really pickey about tab stops -- grr... net/ipsorc Now it just feels like you're dogging me. But OK. Here you go. I uploaded a modified copy of the previous. Honestly, no sour grapes, mind you. But the previous, and most all I can remember, where others were concerned, had the same number of tabs on the additional MASTER_SITES line. I'm just trying to find the pattern here. So I can keep with it. Not really complaining, per se. As to the pkg-plist %%PORTDOCS%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% line. No. I thought the same as you. But check-plist insisted I use the method I have in there, currently. I double checked, and all is added && removed, as expected/anticipated. So that's why it's put in that way. Thanks, John, and I hope that's really "it" this time. ;) --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193185-13-t2oN3KTXcZ>