From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs  Sat Feb 22  5:10: 8 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38C337B401
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 05:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9943FDD
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 05:10:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1MDA5NS031114
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 05:10:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1MDA51u031113;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2003 05:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 05:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200302221310.h1MDA51u031113@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: ports/48512: bogofilter 0.10.3.1 fails if started w/ 'bogofilter -l'
Reply-To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/48512; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
To: Alex Vasylenko <lxv@send-pr.sink.omut.org>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@web.de>,
	freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/48512: bogofilter 0.10.3.1 fails if started w/ 'bogofilter -l'
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:05:40 +0100

 After your patch,
 
 ./bogofilter -l tag -v
 
 would render the -v invisible because option processing aborts at the
 "tag".
 
 ./bogofilter -ltag
 
 however will look the same as
 
 ./bogofilter -l -t -a -g.
 
 and cause all cases of bogus aborts.
 
 The approach chosen upstream to split the option into -l without option
 and -L TAG (with mandatory option) avoids all these problems.
 
 I must therefore reject your patch. 0.10.3.2 or 0.11 is due soon and
 will include the fix. Please use a dummy -l argument until then, it can
 be empty, and it will only matter if you use custom log formats that
 include the %l specifier.
 
 -- 
 Matthias Andree

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message