From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Sun Jan 15 21:46:15 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456FCB1478
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C161620
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0FLkEl0079629
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:46:15 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199897] Mk/bsd.gcc.mk: GCC runtime should be optional
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:46:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerald@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gerald@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-199897-13-MTw3dBZFi5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199897-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199897-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:46:15 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199897

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|Open                        |Closed

--- Comment #7 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> ---
PR 211154 actually came later than this, but it has actual code
proposed (even though that follows the more limited approach mandated
by limits of our packaging system compared to subpackages as RPM has
been supporting for a decade or two).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 211154 ***

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=