From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 2 10:53:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0D137B401 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 10:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp017.mail.yahoo.com (smtp017.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A96543FA3 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 10:53:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q_dolan@yahoo.com.au) Received: from q.onthenet.com.au (HELO ?192.168.100.155?) (q?dolan@203.10.89.214 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 May 2003 17:53:31 -0000 From: Q To: "Daniel C. Sobral" In-Reply-To: <3EB2AC00.7070307@tcoip.com.br> References: <20030502171957.28624.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <3EB2AC00.7070307@tcoip.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1051898086.2269.59.camel@boxster.home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 03 May 2003 03:54:46 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: bzip2(1) compression for manpages, Groff and Texinfo docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 17:53:33 -0000 Correct me if I am wrong, but zlib isn't released under the GPL, so you could switch to using /usr/bin/minigzip instead and it becomes a moot point. Seeya...Q On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 03:33, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Thomas Seck wrote: > > * Garrett Wollman (wollman@lcs.mit.edu): > > > > > >>The correct answer for one of these has no implications on any of > >>the others. > > > > > > I am just a user but I'll second that. > > > > Am I the only one who thinks that some people are on a "kill the GNU, > > kill it now, no matter the cost" trip again? > > > > I can see no benefit in switching to bzip2 other than eliminating GPL'ed > > software. No, I do not think disk space is an issue nowadays. > > If two programs do the same thing, but one is GPL and the other is not, > the other one is clearly preferable for FreeBSD. > > As far as _ports_ are concerned, it is irrelevant. As far as the _base_ > system is concerned, the less we depend on GPL, the better. > > The "sole benefit" you see is clearly enough of a benefit. There _are_ > good reasons to reduce dependency on GPL, y'know.