From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Dec 16 09:32:29 1996
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA19238
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 09:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA19228
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 09:32:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0vZg58-0003wgC; Mon, 16 Dec 96 08:39 PST
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id RAA12288; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 17:28:45 +0100 (MET)
To: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>
cc: Bill Paul <wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>,
        terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Plan for integrating Secure RPC -- comments wanted 
In-reply-to: Your message of "16 Dec 1996 15:00:58 GMT."
             <57ohfubkk5.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk> 
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 17:28:43 +0100
Message-ID: <12286.850753723@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <57ohfubkk5.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk>, Paul Richards writes:

>I had a discussion with someone in the Perl group who was from ORA. He
>claimed FreeBSD was being overly restrictive in it's lack of DES
>code.

My personal reason for not having DES, is not the lack of code due
to export regulations, but lack of trust on my part in the actual
algorithm.  :-)

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@tfs.com           TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.