From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 17:10:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36A7465 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 17:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7AC4696 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 17:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4AHA1tY025157 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 17:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s4AHA1XT025156; Sat, 10 May 2014 17:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 17:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201405101710.s4AHA1XT025156@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "joeb1" Subject: Re: conf/189354: major logic error in /etc/rc.d/jail script for release 10.0 Reply-To: "joeb1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 17:10:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/189354; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "joeb1" To: , Cc: Subject: Re: conf/189354: major logic error in /etc/rc.d/jail script for release 10.0 Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 13:05:11 -0400 After continued research into this problem I have found that this statement is at the cause of the problem. jail_legacy_rc_dir0_flags="-n legacy_rc_dir0 -l -U root" I comment that [flags=] statement out and everything works as expected. My previous diagnosis was incorrect.