From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 17:31:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A111065670 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea@codelabs.ru) Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962058FC16 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:31:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codelabs.ru; s=two; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=pVc1HTzaM3rs0hlbN9qKF3zOzod266xZZi8jfXhwbF4=; b=GvGv2j+5JQvGw89bB2hvHHr60CKe45s/QmNkwI3Ay3hclHAmvmWHWUo+cF0iAiRJR/OtA2CRpve3JQ2kXYee8LpJh7mats9SzlecfFDkeBMdrUCy2RIfArdkJKH3TeGg60OuWfQdv1fATmMbB4TEdXftqiZn/BuprLDITFzzt51nvtlzJgJ7nfFXWJsrO279VZGX22A2DwAs01b2o6ikZWiK5bGGO6ybJTkiUZ/wGzfejnFyfnEtIGGQcnQarzETUstn4WKsDYK36dvWe6fTOrjIddfYl3/yNklX3kqnXlZJgamgeAVGlQl/YFeE0ydCHb6VIAv2CL3Ik4+t4dlRtA==; Received: from amnesiac.at.no.dns (ppp91-78-118-85.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [91.78.118.85]) by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1PcLa8-000Jc2-Hs; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:31:00 +0300 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:30:58 +0300 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <2oLRXl/Jpqz4YgoVq3MShnmlbBE@fEEwdAuY7Lvf1o+SaK2fw+gdbpE> References: <20110110140145.GA94753@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20110110145426.GA96212@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rz+pwK2yUstbofK6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110110145426.GA96212@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Sender: rea@codelabs.ru Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: incomplete pkg-plist for print/teTeX-texmf X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:31:02 -0000 --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:54:26PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > But still, why doesn't pkg_info -W say so? Because it operates on the real entries of +CONTENTS, but ls-R are created via @exec and removed via @unexec. =46rom the other hand, @unexec is spawned after the ls-R =66rom teTeX-texmf will be removed, so such construction (when some file contains both in the pkg-plist and is removed via @unexec using rm -f ) will be harmless and will make that file to appear in 'pkg_info -W '. I don't know what is the general policy for such occurences, porter's handbook has no such information and I had faced such thing for the first time. Anyone? --=20 Eygene Ryabinkin ,,,^..^,,, [ Life's unfair - but root password helps! | codelabs.ru ] [ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC 4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ] --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAk0rQlEACgkQFq+eroFS7PvzjwD/bUezC/icZJE/N7FpkprOmi4t MaM90vs+Dh4pFQLi8U8A/0Z6F9N+GD7m6Jg9Eze+T+JdOwT5REap96vudQQJHkYv =fvvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6--