From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 08:17:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C6816A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446FF43FBF for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:17:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20031126161743016002kj7ie>; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:17:43 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 10EEC6D; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:17:43 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: a@jenisch.at References: <20031126151354.GA3410@athena.oekb.co.at> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Nov 2003 11:17:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20031126151354.GA3410@athena.oekb.co.at> Message-ID: <44ptffcdeh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP-server - suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:17:46 -0000 a@jenisch.at writes: > I'm about to set up a DHCP-server. In the ports-coll I found these: > > Port: isc-dhcp3-3.0.1.r12 > Info: ISC Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol client and server code > > Port: wide-dhcp-1.4.0.6_2 > Info: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol, WIDE Implementation > > Any suggestions / experience with them? (esp. as to > features/reliability is concerned) They're both pretty solid. The differences in features are mostly not relevant to small setups; if you have something particular you're asking about, then let us know what it is -- otherwise, there's no real basis for choosing between them on features. I use the ISC server myself, just because the configuration is slightly more familiar to me (the ISC client is in the FreeBSD base system). You're unlikely to go wrong either way...