From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 27 18:04:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA07137 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:04:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles315.castles.com [208.214.167.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA07132 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:04:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA06590; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:01:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199812280201.SAA06590@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Steven P. Donegan" cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Greg Lehey , FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: Thanks, Core Team In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:00:04 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:01:39 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Steven P. Donegan wrote: > > > > > I read every email on this forum - the above statement is BS. > > Sorry to be short - my point was I have seen no discussion on committing > this (major) change - some comments pro/con yes - doing it no. That makes more sense; I was going to point out that we've been actively discussing the migration for months. The suddenness of the cutover was indeed alarming, but all that was really missing was a HEADS UP. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message