Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:04:36 -0600 From: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multi node storage, ZFS Message-ID: <C901C61A8023D94FD0DFBF27@[192.168.1.44]> In-Reply-To: <b269bc571003240920r3c06a67ci1057921899c36637@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BAA3409.6080406@ionic.co.uk> <b269bc571003240920r3c06a67ci1057921899c36637@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:20 AM -0700 Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal <michal@ionic.co.uk> wrote: > >> I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far >> far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow >> >> Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in >> Multiple servers to create one target of, for example, //officestorage >> Allowing me to expand the storage space when needed and clients being >> able to retrieve data (like RAID0 but over devices not HDD) >> >> Here is an example I found which is where I'm getting some ideas from >> http://www.howtoforge.com/how-to-build-a-low-cost-san-p3 >> >> Horribly, horribly, horribly complex. But, then, that's the Linux world. > :) > > Server 1: bunch of disks exported via iSCSI > Server 2: bunch of disks exported via iSCSI > Server 3: bunch of disks exported via iSCSI > > "SAN" box: uses all those iSCSI exports to create a ZFS pool > > Use 1 iSCSI export from each server to create a raidz vdev. Or multiple > mirror vdevs. When you need more storage, just add another server full of > disks, export them via iSCSI to the "SAN" box, and expand the ZFS pool. > > And, if you need fail-over, on your "SAN" box, you can use HAST at the > lower layers (currently only available in 9-CURRENT) to mirror the > storage across two systems, and use CARP to provide a single IP for the > two boxes. If you were to do something like this, I'd make sure to have a fast local ZIL (log) device on the head node. That would reduce latency for writes, you might also do the same for reads. Then your bulk storage comes from the iSCSI boxes. Just a thought.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C901C61A8023D94FD0DFBF27>