From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 30 15:38:47 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72991C96
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from develloper.unix@hotmail.fr)
Received: from bay0-omc3-s3.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s3.bay0.hotmail.com
 [65.54.190.141])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071F8FC15
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:38:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BAY002-W211 ([65.54.190.188]) by bay0-omc3-s3.bay0.hotmail.com
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); 
 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 07:37:42 -0800
X-EIP: [LhZjUm6ZGBTQUxj9Qwmp4K599y6epUZ5]
X-Originating-Email: [develloper.unix@hotmail.fr]
Message-ID: <BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0@phx.gbl>
From: Quentin SCHWERKOLT <develloper.unix@hotmail.fr>
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>,
 "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: UFS1 vs UFS2
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:37:41 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Dec 2012 15:37:42.0321 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[9B4D6210:01CDE6A3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:38:47 -0000

Since FreeBSD 9.0=2C you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) =
when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition.

Q. Schwerkolt

> Date: Sun=2C 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100
> From: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2
>=20
> OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB.
>=20
> FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes.=
=20
> basic operation seems the same.
>=20
> Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would=20
> have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes=2C but how=
=20
> about performance?
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"
 		 	   		  =