Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:37:41 +0100 From: Quentin SCHWERKOLT <develloper.unix@hotmail.fr> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: UFS1 vs UFS2 Message-ID: <BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Since FreeBSD 9.0=2C you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) = when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition. Q. Schwerkolt > Date: Sun=2C 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 > From: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2 >=20 > OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB. >=20 > FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes.= =20 > basic operation seems the same. >=20 > Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would=20 > have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes=2C but how= =20 > about performance? >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" =
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0>