Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 19:11:19 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au> Subject: Re: PR machine broken? Message-ID: <20050801171119.GA18352@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <BA66FB8CA2BB6E772258D7FC@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <2E1EC4D96E17CB668506B6A5@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122910887.789.15.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20050801163712.GA9070@graf.pompo.net> <BA66FB8CA2BB6E772258D7FC@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Lun 1 aoû 05 à 18:44:18 +0200, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> écrivait : > >By the way, this is really an update, and the RCS tag must be preserved. > >You should resubmit it as a patch, because it will be committed this > >way, and we want to keep the history in CVS. > > > OK. Should I resubmit using the PR that was just issued? Yes, please. If it is important, you can compress + uuencode it. > >I had a quick look at this port, and noted something strange: it depends > >on both tcl/tk 83 and 84; is that normal? CATEGORIES are set to tk83... > > > I wasn't sure what to do with that. The port uses tk84 and does not > require tk83, but there *is* no category for tk84 (should one be create?), > so I left that alone. Hmm... you're right! I was sure that tcl84 / tk84 exist. Yet this port depends on itk, which is linked with tk83. > I wasn't sure that I should do patches, because the new port is radically > different from the old port. If I do patches, I'll also have to add text > explaining the changes. Not quite sure how to proceed...... A summary would be sufficient. Regards, -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050801171119.GA18352>