From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 03:08:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7263616A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:08:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0232E43D2D for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D36721CB18 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16451-18 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1223421C966 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:14 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:09 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <0FB997694448EE4FF1EFE202@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <422F7212.4080601@cloudview.com> In-Reply-To: <422F7212.4080601@cloudview.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503092108.13271.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: feedback on a good DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:08:17 -0000 --nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 March 2005 04:00 pm, John Pettitt wrote: > The argument against DJBDNS comes down to a) DJB annoys a lot of people > and b) some of those people thinkg DJBDNS is not standards compliant. Erm, "b" is definitely true. It doesn't support IXFR or NOTIFY, so if you= =20 plan on slaving another zone (or having another server slave one of your=20 zones), then you're expected to install rsync and get your peer to do the=20 same. Oh, and c) djbdns isn't Free or Open Source by any definition of=20 either phrase. That's not important to some people, but others consider it= =20 kind of important. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCL7od5sRg+Y0CpvERAnvwAKCKrdHds4T+ksbzfXbKrE3VjI3xhgCfZU+U saOkWLHbRrw4mjjHYjEjzYc= =bRYn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5--