From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Mar 22 14:55:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F3E15485C4 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5ABD8697E for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5F71915485C0; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CB615485BF for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72DD8697C for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F7F13BAA for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x2MEtPW7000313 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x2MEtPQw000309 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236716] net/ntopng: pfSense ntopng Port - Historical graph inaccurate Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: madpilot@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: madpilot@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to short_desc cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:55:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236716 Guido Falsi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |madpilot@FreeBSD.org Summary|pfSense ntopng Port - |net/ntopng: pfSense ntopng |Historical graph inaccurate |Port - Historical graph | |inaccurate CC| |madpilot@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #1 from Guido Falsi --- I'm taking this as the maintainer of the ntopng port. I'm not sure though how to address this. It looks like an ntopng problem, s= ince the graphs are generated by it. Does not look like a porting problem but an upstream bug. I'll try looking at it. Anyway it is important to note that historical data= is actually smoothed out, as you say, so a single peak, or many small peaks wi= ll rarely show in the graph. If I remember correctly those graphs are generated using rrdtool. That tool registers data for timeframes (let's say 5 minutes= , or 1 day) and for each timeframe registers a minimum a maximum and an average value. It can well be the graph is drawn using only the averages, while the other data also uses the min/max values, which then would never show in the graph. It could be interesting to test if this happens with a vanilla FreeBSD box = or a a Linux box too. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=