Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:33:38 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ Message-ID: <50B3D222.30209@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: <1353945435502-5764353.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <CAF6rxgk9UJRk07SXfLzK97ZaTO0aTsoUQ9-06UzdnGV4JHL4ug@mail.gmail.com> <1353868081735-5764056.post@n5.nabble.com> <CAF6rxgkXOjRfupbRmfGCAsDeCMnP70JGdywxBw=QToyTOqpVmA@mail.gmail.com> <1353941396782-5764313.post@n5.nabble.com> <50B38A3F.6020001@gmail.com> <1353945307512-5764351.post@n5.nabble.com> <1353945435502-5764353.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/26/12 16:57, Jakub Lach wrote: > As a reminder, this isn't a contest in kernel size :) > Didn't mean to, I just put it there to state that 1.5 - 2.5 MB for a GENERIC kernel is not appropriate anymore. > More useful would be if somebody would check GENERIC > on i386/amd64 for FAQ update. Thanks Miroslav Lachman for the reply with the correct sizes for GENERIC kernels. Change FAQ 8.3 Why is my kernel so big? Nowadays kernels are compiled in /debug mode by default/. Kernels built in debug mode contain many symbols that are used for debugging, thus greatly increasing the size of the kernel. Note that there will be little or no performance decrease from running a debug kernel, and it is useful in case of a system panic. However....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B3D222.30209>