From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 8 14:57:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA041065697 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523A38FC22 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:57:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAAu1b0uDaFvH/2dsb2JhbADXPIRUBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,430,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="64634347" Received: from danube.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.91.199]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2010 09:57:27 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by danube.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA9B10840B1; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:57:27 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at danube.cs.uoguelph.ca Received: from danube.cs.uoguelph.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (danube.cs.uoguelph.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8LJpH1AdreU; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:57:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.102]) by danube.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D6A1084073; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:57:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (rmacklem@localhost) by muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id o18F8he27625; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:08:43 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca: rmacklem owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:08:43 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem X-X-Sender: rmacklem@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <4B6FE550.9020506@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Message-ID: References: <4B6FE550.9020506@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFSv4: mount -t nsf4 not the same as mount_newnfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:57:28 -0000 On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Mounting the filessystem via > > mount_newnfs host:/path /path > Oh, and you should set: sysctl vfs.newnfs.locallocks_enable=0 in the server, since I haven't fixed the local locking yet. (This implies that apps/daemons running locally on the server won't see byte range locks performed by NFSv4 clients.) However, byte range locking between NFSv4 clients should work ok. rick