From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 19 15:44:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3225516A419; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B43B13C46B; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47921AE2.1060004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:44:34 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20080118120140.2a8170a0@dev> <47921931.9050606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47921931.9050606@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jakub Siroky Subject: infinite loop when copying to ext2fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:44:43 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Jakub Siroky wrote: >> I have two large ext2fs partitions (368 and 313GB) to hold data shared >> between several OSes. While there were no problems on 6-STABLE branch >> I was quite disappointed after upgrade to 7-STABLE. Whenever I >> copy/write to ext2fs partition the system freezes totally without >> crashdump. So I set debugging settings to kernel config >> (DEBUG,WITNESS,..) and in console I reproduced error situation ending >> with full screen of unstoppable running text with lot of memory >> addresses and a few recognisable words: 'new block bit set for ext >> already' - again with no crashdump. Then I have formatted 1GB >> partition with ext2fs and the problem on this small partition appears >> only sometimes. > > OK, I am able to reproduce this. > > Kris > Is anyone able to look at this? I could not spot a candidate change that has not been merged to 6.x. Kris