From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 9 06:43:38 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA29608 for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 06:43:38 -0700 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA29599 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 06:43:37 -0700 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Sun, 9 Jul 1995 08:43:32 -0500 X-Sender: wacky@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 08:43:33 -0500 To: Poul-Henning Kamp From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that >got comitted on july 5th !) "BUILT-950708" -- Does he have it? IMHO, "2.1d0803" where 0803 represents the CTM update level or "2.1d950706" where that represents the date of the source file sup would be more useful. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net