From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 28 06:22:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB80516A4CE; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD2843D1F; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:22:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-current-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004032814221801200n75fbe>; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:22:22 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 314FAF; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:22:18 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: John Baldwin References: <20040318132321.F9436@root.org> <44r7vg5r2j.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44lllo5quz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200403261407.22278.jhb@FreeBSD.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Mar 2004 09:22:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200403261407.22278.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <44n061rqzp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: agp0 hang in 5.2.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:22:23 -0000 John Baldwin writes: > Can you try moving those hunks into the attach method rather than the probe > method by the way? Certainly. I don't expect that to work though, because in my case the lockup was happening in the probe itself. [Yes, that means that the hardware is exhibiting fairly broken behaviour; but I still wanted to run FreeBSD on it...] It will probably take me a few days; the buildworld (which I need for unrelated reasons) takes many hours for this system. > For what it's worth, Warner and I are talking off-line > about a more general approach in the new-bus code itself. I did see a message where he said he was also planning on including a mechanism for avoiding the probe.