From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct  9 08:40:47 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA14095
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 08:40:47 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA14083
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 08:40:43 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA00655; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 08:40:40 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id IAA00177; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 08:40:40 -0700
Message-Id: <199510091540.IAA00177@corbin.Root.COM>
To: se@zpr.uni-koeln.de (Stefan Esser)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: boot failure 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 95 13:31:57 BST."
             <199510091231.AA27046@Sysiphos> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1995 08:40:40 -0700
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>But to get feedback on this problem, I'd rather have the 
>current revision in -stable, or I'll never be able to 
>understand what's going on.
>
>It results in aboot failure, but those people can just 
>boot their kernel.old. There is no risk of data corruption.
>Please let me have a chance to get some feedback ...
>
>I'll try to resolve this in time for 2.1R !

   Thanks...problems like this at this point in the release process make me
very nervous. I very much appreciate your help...

-DG