From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 10 8:44: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nelly.internal.irrelevant.org (irrelevant.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FFC37B404 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simond by nelly.internal.irrelevant.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16vKG9-0003L3-00; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:43:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:43:45 +0100 From: Simon Dick To: wes chow Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pgp Message-ID: <20020410154345.GJ2686@irrelevant.org> References: <20020410113130.Y6378-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020410113130.Y6378-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:35:05AM -0400, wes chow wrote: > > What implementation of pgp is currently the most popular? I was thinking > about using gnupg, but it's not compatible with pgp 2.x, which uses the > patented IDEA encryption scheme. Is this going to be a big inconvenience? I use gnupg personally, there is the possibility to use IDEA if you install the security/gnupg-idea port -- Simon Dick simond@irrelevant.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message