From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct  6 07:37:59 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA01896
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 07:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from elvis.vnet.net (elvis.vnet.net [166.82.1.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA01877
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com)
Received: from ponds.dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48])
          by elvis.vnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id KAA24542; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:31:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes [10.0.0.3])
	by ponds.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA04558;
	Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:47:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id KAA06974; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:37:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:37:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>
Message-Id: <199710061437.KAA06974@lakes.dignus.com>
To: grog@lemis.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification)
Cc: dk+@ua.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@smith.net.au,
        pechter@lakewood.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> On Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 01:14:03AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> >> Who can decide on this?   Is there a conspiracy behind it? ;-)
> >
> > Given that I don't particularly *care* about UUCP in the first place,
> > I really don't mind what goes into 2.2.5 as far as this is concerned.
> >
> > Anyone masochistic enough to still use UUCP in this day and age is
> > also capable of fixing any breakage that may occur, I think.  Go for it. ;)
> 
> The funny thing is, UUCP is no longer the can of worms it used to be.
> With Taylor command files, it's quite easy to set up.  I wonder why
> people want anything else.
> 
> Greg
> 

 (If you mean, anything else other than Taylor config files...)

 Well - you saw my reasons before... mostly because that's how I've
done it for many years...  but, other than that - you're right.

 I'm glad to see this going into 2.2.5....

	- Dave Rivers -