From owner-freebsd-small Wed Mar 24 10:41:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (quackerjack.cc.vt.edu [198.82.160.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA23153AC for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 10:41:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jobaldwi@vt.edu) Received: from sable.cc.vt.edu (sable.cc.vt.edu [128.173.16.30]) by quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA21399; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:40:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from john.baldwin.cx (jobaldwi.campus.vt.edu [198.82.67.63]) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA11414; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:40:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <99032408375603.00328@babsi.tu-graz.ac.at> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:40:45 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Michael Bretterklieber Subject: RE:Problems with PicoBSD 0.43 in 3.1-RELEASE Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't belive so because PAM requires dynamic modules (i.e. it can't be statically compiled in) and AFAIK PicoBSD doesn't support dynamic libaries and/or modules. That was the reason NOPAM was created in the first place. On 24-Mar-99 Michael Bretterklieber wrote: > Hi, > > My custom setup works now, and the problem that init died > was PAM. After I removed PAM (-DNOPAM in Makefile of crunch1), > it worked. > Has anybody a custom Version with PAM? --- John Baldwin -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message