From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Mar 2 9: 9: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from dalamar.cs.uwec.edu (dalamar.cs.uwec.edu [137.28.109.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D2714D77 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:07:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from godfreja@dalamar.cs.uwec.edu) Received: from localhost (godfreja@localhost) by dalamar.cs.uwec.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA25650; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:04:47 -0600 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:04:46 -0600 (EST) From: Jason Andrew Godfrey To: "Robert A. Bruce" Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart In-Reply-To: <199903021005.CAA01177@pike.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hope this isn't too late, but one slight correction. I've been informed (because I made the same claim about linux only running linux binaries) that Linux can run SCO binaries with the proper module. Of course, FreeBSD still can run more binary types. -- Jason On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Robert A. Bruce wrote: > Okay, the first draft of the FreeBSD vs Linux chart is done. I > included Windows NT, because it is always fun to make Microsoft > look bad, and it keeps this from looking too anti-Linux. > > http://www.cdrom.com/~rab/bsd_chart.html > > I appreciate any feedback or suggestions. Also spelling/grammer > errors, etc. This is for San Jose LinuxWorld, so it needs to go > to Kinko's by 8am PST. But late input is still appreciated. I > can print out a new edition for Wednesday and Thursday. > > Does anyone have a good URL for an explaination of "Softupdates"? > A lot of people will not know what it is, and I would like to > provide a link. > > -bob > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message