From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 05:24:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D4516A4CE; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net (razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BBF43FF5; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:24:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfikl.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.202.149] helo=mindspring.com) by razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AMoms-0000Pn-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:23:58 -0800 Message-ID: <3FBCBF85.3CC58588@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:20:05 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20031120013831.GT98272@klapaucius.zer0.org> <20031120072423.GA80697@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a429a5dfd8b590227f956b25fefab4ec8e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Minnesota Slinky cc: chat@FreeBSD.org cc: 'SWIT' cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO going after BSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:24:33 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:28:04PM -0600, Minnesota Slinky wrote: > > > I talked to a couple of people who do beta testing for Microsoft and > > they said the issue came up a few years ago. According to them (one > > being my father), it has to do with security and virus protection. > > Again, this is second-hand, so take it for what it's worth... > > There's no possible sense in which this can be true. Plain text > attachments do not create a security or virus risk. When your message has "Content-Disposition: inline", and the handler for rendeing "Content-type: text/plain" happens to be Microsoft Word... -- Terry