From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 16:56:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B15E16A46F for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EA113C494 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:56:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l25GuZGK062070; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:56:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Doug Barton Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:56:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <45EB55DD.4030201@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <45EB55DD.4030201@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703051156.34866.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2735/Mon Mar 5 10:23:59 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation instability X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:56:37 -0000 On Sunday 04 March 2007 06:27 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > jkim, > > The attached change to sys/i386/linux/linux_machdep.c causes my > linux emulation to spontaneously reboot my machine (no panic, just > BOOM) whenever I use the linux version of the thunderbird beta > (that I'm using right now to type this). I built a system from > sources right before this change and everything is normal, then > when I add this change it becomes unstable. That is very strange. > I'm currently in the process of building an up to date -current > without this change to see if that's stable for me, but I thought > you'd want to know ASAP. Please go ahead and let me know. Thanks, Jung-uk Kim