Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 May 2003 17:05:04 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: LOR with -current
Message-ID:  <16058.50816.59468.320017@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030508.111836.130233489.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20030508.124929.74756191.haro@kgt.co.jp> <20030508.102242.72244093.imp@bsdimp.com> <16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030508.111836.130233489.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

M. Warner Losh writes:
 > 
 > Does anybdoy know why the ddb output doesn't go into the dmesg buffer
 > in general?  It sure would save me a lot of grief as well if it did.

If there's no techincal reason for omitting it, then I'd be in favor
of logging all ddb input and output to the message buffer.

Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16058.50816.59468.320017>