From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 30 10:30:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 165ED16A4B3; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 38D5743FBD; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from 66.127.85.91 ([66.127.85.91])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8UHU10x077269
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Organization: Errno Consulting
To: "Kang Liu" <liukang@bjpu.edu.cn>,
	<freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:28:19 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <012901c38772$8288c9d0$e04e70ca@lkatschool>
In-Reply-To: <012901c38772$8288c9d0$e04e70ca@lkatschool>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200309301028.19046.sam@errno.com>
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/50216: kernel panic on 5.0-current when use ipfw2 with
	dynamic rules
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:30:08 -0000

On Tuesday 30 September 2003 09:47 am, Kang Liu wrote:
> I reproduced it on the latest 5.1current.

Thanks.  I'll look at it.

	Sam