From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 12 21:11:53 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA21941 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:11:53 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA21934 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:11:39 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA00796; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 12:10:53 +0800 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 12:10:52 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Bill Fenner cc: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L Subject: Re: Minor nits about bindist... In-Reply-To: <95Jun12.112240pdt.49859@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Jun 1995, Bill Fenner wrote: > > My machine has two IP addresses. Which one do I put in $ipaddr? The first modification I made doesn't support that (as Rodney pointed out). All my machines answer on only one IP address on a single interface, so I didn't take any special considerations for multihomed hosts. > I might go for > > ipaddr_ed0="13.0.208.200" > ipaddr_de0="192.168.128.1" Yes, this is "expanded" version I sent to Rodney for his perusal. It fits in quite nicely with the $blah_${if_name} convention used elsewhere in /etc/netstart, although I haven't been able to try it out on my own systems. > and I do think that the multicast route should use an IP address > instead of a name, as you might want your multicast route to point out > a different interface than your primary name. But I also think it's > definitely 2.1 material. Yeah, it's a little late for 2.0.5 now. ;-) -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org