From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 12 11:04:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A73C1 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0356CBA for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id dn14so4262840obc.4 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 04:04:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kAaL6Xq0d6T7rXVifx6b6gMSBTdnCUTZm/GUuh8K0i0=; b=FyY2GruIjG9WQhjD9iIoSSPVTUIzr/rsATvby4IfcMKZVpc57KRasuhqUjtI2ATgf5 5fXDt9iHbSvaAW3kcKyVdkTjBl1qE24V3+IYm2Mt3acUrMxaUdK5lie7+Gxe1tc7JvPD ZxXtGhQtuVZgEzNJh0Q7XErjZZa/hRFz4FyDrLo1Q511443ioxlGRnvPjWFltxwmNge3 R0J0bjQukjxrrXjFDvcAQSBBZMRQoCxDDeXtvNM4LsoerzTp55F1vW3yi0KnC0t5HDlq TiWq/Do3ikHy0vMEUKd1FkDgIhd7+WDushYjwQNsyxZO3VZd788jQLuhERHBhic2S9yz hg7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.151.9 with SMTP id um9mr11555333obb.89.1363086269282; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 04:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.94.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 04:04:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <513EF8D1.8010006@rainbow-runner.nl> References: <513EF8D1.8010006@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:04:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dconf-0.12.1_1 fails to compile From: Andreas Nilsson To: Koop Mast Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:04:29 -0000 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Koop Mast wrote: > On 12-3-2013 9:46, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Runnings some updates of my installed packages wanted to update dconf, but >> that fails: >> >> ==============================**==============================** >> ========== >> ================================================= >> ===> Patching for dconf-0.12.1_1 >> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for dconf-0.12.1_1 >> ==============================**==============================** >> ========== >> ================================================= >> ===> dconf-0.12.1_1 depends on package: vala>=0.11.7 - found >> ===> dconf-0.12.1_1 depends on executable: gmake - found >> ===> dconf-0.12.1_1 depends on shared library: dbus-1 - found >> ===> dconf-0.12.1_1 depends on shared library: glib-2.0 - found >> ===> dconf-0.12.1_1 depends on shared library: pcre - found >> ===> Configuring for dconf-0.12.1_1 >> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g >> wheel >> checking whether build environment is sane... yes >> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... aux/install-sh -c -d >> checking for gawk... no >> checking for mawk... no >> checking for nawk... nawk >> checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes >> checking whether gmake supports nested variables... yes >> checking for gcc... cc >> checking whether the C compiler works... yes >> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out >> checking for suffix of executables... >> checking whether we are cross compiling... no >> checking for suffix of object files... o >> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes >> checking whether cc accepts -g... yes >> checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed >> checking for style of include used by gmake... GNU >> checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 >> checking for valac... /usr/local/bin/valac >> checking /usr/local/bin/valac is at least version 0.15.1... no >> configure: error: Vala 0.15.1 not found. >> >> >> I find it quite interesting that the Makefile for dconf depends on >> vala>0.11.7, as this is obviously bogus. >> >> Also vala in ports seems to be 0.15.1, so how is this supposed to work? >> >> This is on 9.1-RELEASE, ports fetched this night with portsnap. >> >> Best regards >> Andreas >> > That is really strange because vala was updated to 0.18.1 in the same > commit that dconf to updated to 0.12. I just ran portsnap on my server and > the vala version is correct. Could you run portsnap again to see if you get > a updated vala port? I'm not sure what to suggest else. I will fix the vala > check in dconf, thanks! > > -Koop > Interesting, seems to be the case here as well; 2 of my 3 ports trees has vala at 0.18.1. Sorry for the noise. Best regards Andreas