From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 14 10:12:48 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC50D1065672
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from makc@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A41D8FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mercury.ph.man.ac.uk [130.88.75.175:55430] (HELO/EHLO
	mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with LOGIN)
	by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id q4EAD0Ti089315 (using TLSv1/SSLv3,
	with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO)
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:13:01 +0400 (MSK)
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:14:22 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201205141014.23338.makc@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Boost ports update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:12:49 -0000

On Mon, 14 May 2012 10:04:45 +0200, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> is there anything we can do to help you with the update to 1.48 right 
> now?
> The default release cycle of boost suggests that 1.50 will soon be 
> released (although we might have some time since there have been 
> questions about the release plan for 1.50 and no definite answers to it 
> yet)
> 
> It would be nice to have 1.48 in ports prior to that release so we can 
> have a go at 1.50 as soon as it has been released...

Here's the list of ports that fails with new boost:
http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-8-exp-latest/index_edited.html

Patches and fixes are welcome. But I'm going to commit the update soon anyway.

Cheers,
Max