Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:14:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portmk/Mk bsd.apache.mk bsd.database.mk bsd.java.mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.post.mk bsd.port.pre.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk bsd.tcl.mk ports/devel/portmk/scripts distfiles.sh options.pl options.sh ranksites-fping.pl ... Message-ID: <20050918211457.GA34042@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050919000610.381d93db@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200509182034.j8IKYCUv065506@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050918234714.41544927@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20050918205816.GA17932@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050919000610.381d93db@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:06:10AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:58:16 -0400 > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:47:14PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:34:12 +0000 (UTC) > > > Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > >=20 > > > > clement 2005-09-18 20:34:12 UTC > > > >=20 > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > >=20 > > > > Modified files: > > > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk=20 > > > > Added files: > > > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.apache.mk bsd.database.mk > > > > bsd.java.mk bsd.tcl.mk=20 > > > > Removed files: > > > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.port.post.mk bsd.port.pre.mk=20 > > > > devel/portmk/scripts distfiles.sh options.pl options.sh=20 > > > > ranksites-fping.pl ranksites-geoip.pl=20 > > > > Log: > > > > - Sync portmk with next exp-build patchset. > > >=20 > > > Many thanks. Can we assume that from now on we'll have in this port > > > the next set of changes one-two weeks before they'll be in the > > > base ? > >=20 > > This time it will be at least 1-2 weeks because we can't actually > > commit the changes until 6.0 is out, but I don't know if we'll be able > > to do this in future, because this would actually introduce delays > > into the schedule, which really isn't something we need. > >=20 > > Typically when one of us has time to run a test build, the changes are > > selected then and put into testing almost immediately, with the > > results known within a day or two. Waiting before starting the test > > would run the risk of losing the window of availability to run the > > test build, and waiting afterwards would allow new errors to creep in. >=20 > What I would like is to have access to the "next set of changes" so > that I can catch any problems I might have with my scripts that > sometimes make use of "unsupported" features of *.mk > Even 2-3 days would help. We should be able to manage that. Kris --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDLdjQWry0BWjoQKURAnRVAKD/m804N3XZrSzUG9hgZckphGv70gCeMSp6 AuhJHmxTzmWPqvqu9cVgWwc= =hQ66 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050918211457.GA34042>