From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 1 19:28: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBF637B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e922S0w28379; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:28:00 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: graphics Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: High Performance NICs Message-ID: <20001001192800.K27736@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <019d01c02c15$f2b72c80$c991f280@mfn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <019d01c02c15$f2b72c80$c991f280@mfn.org>; from lart@mfn.org on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:10:31PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * graphics [001001 19:20] wrote: > Greetings, > > We have several very-high throughput boxen (>300 GB/day each) > sitting on an Arrowpoint CS100 switch. Our problem is that at these > sustained throughput levels, our NICs just crumble :-( you want fxp (Intel EtherExpress Pro). -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message