From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 6 12:26:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1724106570A for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12E18FC28 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA00928; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:26:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <49D9F4EE.4000004@icyb.net.ua> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:26:22 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <49D9F14F.2000208@icyb.net.ua> <01986997@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <01986997@bb.ipt.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [qemu] raw_aio_remove: aio request not found! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:26:59 -0000 on 06/04/2009 15:13 Boris Samorodov said the following: > On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:10:55 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: > > >> I had two qemu crashes with the following diagnostics: >> raw_aio_remove: aio request not found! > >> Unfortunately I wasn't able to obtain useful stack traces (no debug). >> qemu was started as: >> qemu-system-x86_64 -no-kqemu ... >> This is amd64 stable/7 system (without VFS_AIO), qemu-0.10.1_1. > > May be a dumb question: is aio kldloaded? Yes, it is loaded and it seems that it was loaded automatically (i.e. I didn't do it explicitly). BTW I thought that it was not needed for qemu-0.10, unlike qemu-0.9. -- Andriy Gapon